Demographics details for Southaven, MS vs Griffin, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Southaven, MS vs Griffin, GA.

Data Southaven Griffin
Population 56,360 23,693
Median Age 35.4 years 33.2 years
Median Income $72,513 $42,047
Married Families 37.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Southaven vs Griffin

  • In Southaven, the population is higher at 56,360, compared to 23,693 in Griffin.
  • Residents in Southaven have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
  • Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513 compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Southaven at 37.0% compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
  • The poverty level is higher in Griffin at 15%, compared to 12% in Southaven.
  • Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Southaven.

Demographics

Demographics Southaven vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Southaven Griffin
Black 35 52
White 55 36
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 5 5
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Southaven vs Griffin

  • In Griffin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 35% in Southaven.
  • Southaven has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 36% in Griffin.
  • Both Southaven and Griffin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Southaven and Griffin at 5%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Griffin at 5%, compared to 4% in Southaven.
  • In Griffin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Southaven.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Southaven Griffin
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 14.6%
Depression 22.9% 19.7%
Smoking 16.7% 22.4%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 13.4%
Obesity 39.7% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Southaven vs Griffin

  • In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Southaven at 22.9% compared to 19.7% in Griffin.
  • Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Southaven at 14.1% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Southaven at 39.7% compared to 38.8% in Griffin.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Griffin at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Southaven.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Southaven Griffin
No Schooling 1.2% (658) 2.2% (517)
High School Diploma 15.8% (8,925) 22.6% (5,347)
Less than High School 8.7% (4,879) 16.3% (3,859)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (9,035) 11.9% (2,819)

Education Levels Comparison: Southaven vs Griffin

  • In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.2% in Southaven.
  • In Griffin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Griffin at 16.3%, compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Southaven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.