Demographics details for Southaven, MS vs Fultondale, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southaven, MS vs Fultondale, AL.
| Data | Southaven | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,360 | 9,677 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $72,513 | $72,741 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Southaven vs Fultondale
- In Southaven, the population is higher at 56,360, compared to 9,677 in Fultondale.
- The median age in Fultondale is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 35.4 years in Southaven.
- Fultondale has a higher median income of $72,741, compared to $72,513 in Southaven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Southaven at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Fultondale.
- Southaven has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- Fultondale has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Southaven.
Demographics
Demographics Southaven vs Fultondale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southaven | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 35 |
| White | 55 | 51 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southaven vs Fultondale
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Southaven and Fultondale at 35%.
- Southaven has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 51% in Fultondale.
- In Fultondale, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Southaven.
- Fultondale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Southaven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Southaven at 4% compared to 3% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southaven and Fultondale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southaven | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southaven vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fultondale at 23.9% versus 22.9% in Southaven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Southaven at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fultondale at 16.4% compared to 14.1% in Southaven.
- Obesity rates are higher in Southaven at 39.7% compared to 36.4% in Fultondale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fultondale at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Southaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southaven | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (658) | 1.3% (121) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (8,925) | 17.1% (1,657) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (4,879) | 10.4% (1,005) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (9,035) | 18.1% (1,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southaven vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Southaven.
- In Fultondale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fultondale at 10.4%, compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- In Fultondale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 16.0% in Southaven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.