Demographics details for Southaven, MS vs Flemington, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southaven, MS vs Flemington, NJ.
| Data | Southaven | Flemington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,360 | 4,906 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $72,513 | $85,306 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Southaven vs Flemington
- In Southaven, the population is higher at 56,360, compared to 4,906 in Flemington.
- Residents in Southaven have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 32.4 years in Flemington.
- Flemington has a higher median income of $85,306, compared to $72,513 in Southaven.
- In Flemington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Southaven.
- Southaven has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Flemington.
- Flemington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Southaven.
Demographics
Demographics Southaven vs Flemington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southaven | Flemington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 6 |
| White | 55 | 58 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southaven vs Flemington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Southaven at 35% compared to 6% in Flemington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Flemington at 58% compared to 55% in Southaven.
- In Flemington, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Southaven.
- Flemington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 5% in Southaven.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Flemington at 6%, compared to 4% in Southaven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southaven and Flemington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southaven | Flemington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southaven vs Flemington
- In Flemington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flemington at 23.8% versus 22.9% in Southaven.
- Flemington has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Flemington at 16.8% compared to 14.1% in Southaven.
- Obesity rates are higher in Southaven at 39.7% compared to 34.8% in Flemington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Southaven at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Flemington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southaven | Flemington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (658) | 2.6% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (8,925) | 16.8% (825) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (4,879) | 23.5% (1,155) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (9,035) | 22.8% (1,117) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southaven vs Flemington
- In Flemington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.2% in Southaven.
- In Flemington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flemington at 23.5%, compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- In Flemington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 16.0% in Southaven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.