Demographics details for Southaven, MS vs Evansville, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southaven, MS vs Evansville, IN.
Data | Southaven | Evansville |
---|---|---|
Population | 56,360 | 115,749 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 38.1 years |
Median Income | $72,513 | $49,853 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Southaven vs Evansville
- The population in Evansville is higher at 115,749, compared to 56,360 in Southaven.
- The median age in Evansville is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 35.4 years in Southaven.
- Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513 compared to $49,853 in Evansville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Southaven at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Evansville.
- The poverty level is higher in Evansville at 13%, compared to 12% in Southaven.
- Evansville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.2% in Southaven.
Demographics
Demographics Southaven vs Evansville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Southaven | Evansville |
---|---|---|
Black | 35 | 14 |
White | 55 | 76 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southaven vs Evansville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Southaven at 35% compared to 14% in Evansville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Evansville at 76% compared to 55% in Southaven.
- Both Southaven and Evansville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Southaven at 5% compared to 4% in Evansville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Evansville at 5%, compared to 4% in Southaven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southaven and Evansville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Southaven | Evansville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.8% |
Depression | 22.9% | 27.6% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 23.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southaven vs Evansville
- In Evansville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Evansville at 27.6% versus 22.9% in Southaven.
- Evansville has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Evansville at 15.9% compared to 14.1% in Southaven.
- Evansville has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 39.7% in Southaven.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Evansville at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Southaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Southaven | Evansville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (658) | 0.8% (939) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (8,925) | 20.0% (23,144) |
Less than High School | 8.7% (4,879) | 13.6% (15,701) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (9,035) | 15.7% (18,125) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southaven vs Evansville
- A higher percentage of residents in Southaven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Evansville.
- In Evansville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Evansville at 13.6%, compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southaven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 15.7% in Evansville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.