Demographics details for Southaven, MS vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southaven, MS vs Cochran, GA.
| Data | Southaven | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,360 | 4,647 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $72,513 | $31,326 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Southaven vs Cochran
- In Southaven, the population is higher at 56,360, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- Residents in Southaven have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Southaven at 37.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 12% in Southaven.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Southaven and Cochran at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Southaven vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southaven | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 53 |
| White | 55 | 40 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Southaven vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 35% in Southaven.
- Southaven has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- In Cochran, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Southaven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Southaven at 5% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Southaven at 4% compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Southaven and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southaven | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southaven vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Depression is more prevalent in Southaven at 22.9% compared to 21.8% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Southaven at 14.1% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Obesity rates are higher in Southaven at 39.7% compared to 38.5% in Cochran.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Southaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southaven | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (658) | 1.2% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (8,925) | 12.2% (569) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (4,879) | 15.1% (703) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (9,035) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southaven vs Cochran
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Southaven and Cochran at 1.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southaven hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Southaven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.