Demographics details for Southaven, MS vs Chandler, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Southaven, MS vs Chandler, OK.
| Data | Southaven | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 56,360 | 2,895 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $72,513 | $48,168 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Southaven vs Chandler
- In Southaven, the population is higher at 56,360, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- The median age in Chandler is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 35.4 years in Southaven.
- Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513 compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Southaven.
- The poverty level is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 12% in Southaven.
- Chandler has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Southaven.
Demographics
Demographics Southaven vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Southaven | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 35 | 9 |
| White | 55 | 72 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Southaven vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Southaven at 35% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandler at 72% compared to 55% in Southaven.
- In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Southaven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Southaven at 5% compared to 1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 4% in Southaven.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Southaven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Southaven | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Southaven vs Chandler
- In Chandler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.6% in Southaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chandler at 24.6% versus 22.9% in Southaven.
- Chandler has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 16.7% in Southaven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 14.1% in Southaven.
- Chandler has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 39.7% in Southaven.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Southaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Southaven | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (658) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (8,925) | 23.9% (691) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (4,879) | 12.8% (372) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (9,035) | 16.2% (469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Southaven vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Southaven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 15.8% in Southaven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chandler at 12.8%, compared to 8.7% in Southaven.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 16.0% in Southaven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.