Demographics details for South windsor, CT vs Nevada, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South windsor, CT vs Nevada, MO.

Data South windsor Nevada
Population 26,054 8,205
Median Age 42.0 years 38.4 years
Median Income $90,964 $44,318
Married Families 62.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 5% 14%
Unemployment Rate 2.2 3.4

Population Comparison: South windsor vs Nevada

  • In South windsor, the population is higher at 26,054, compared to 8,205 in Nevada.
  • Residents in South windsor have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 38.4 years in Nevada.
  • South windsor has a higher median income of $90,964 compared to $44,318 in Nevada.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South windsor at 62.0% compared to 28.0% in Nevada.
  • The poverty level is higher in Nevada at 14%, compared to 5% in South windsor.
  • Nevada has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 2.2% in South windsor.

Demographics

Demographics South windsor vs Nevada provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South windsor Nevada
Black 9 1
White 85 90
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 4
Two or More Races 2 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South windsor vs Nevada

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South windsor at 9% compared to 1% in Nevada.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Nevada at 90% compared to 85% in South windsor.
  • The Asian population is larger in South windsor at 3% compared to 0% in Nevada.
  • Nevada has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in South windsor.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Nevada at 5%, compared to 2% in South windsor.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South windsor and Nevada at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South windsor Nevada
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.1%
Depression Data is updating% 26.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 26.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.1%
Obesity Data is updating% 38.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South windsor vs Nevada

  • In Nevada, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Nevada at 26.7% versus 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Nevada has a higher smoking rate at 26.3% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Nevada at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Nevada has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Nevada at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South windsor Nevada
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (89)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 20.8% (1,706)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.1% (1,155)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.8% (972)

Education Levels Comparison: South windsor vs Nevada

  • In Nevada, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • In Nevada, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Nevada at 14.1%, compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • In Nevada, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.