Demographics details for South solon, OH vs Reading, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South solon, OH vs Reading, PA.
| Data | South solon | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 327 | 94,858 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 31.1 years |
| Median Income | $56,563 | $42,852 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: South solon vs Reading
- The population in Reading is higher at 94,858, compared to 327 in South solon.
- Residents in South solon have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 31.1 years in Reading.
- South solon has a higher median income of $56,563 compared to $42,852 in Reading.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South solon at 48.0% compared to 22.0% in Reading.
- The poverty level is higher in Reading at 25%, compared to 12% in South solon.
- Reading has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in South solon.
Demographics
Demographics South solon vs Reading provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South solon | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 11 |
| White | 70 | 60 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 67 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South solon vs Reading
- In Reading, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in South solon.
- South solon has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 60% in Reading.
- In Reading, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in South solon.
- Reading has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 20% in South solon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Reading at 21%, compared to 10% in South solon.
- In Reading, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in South solon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South solon | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 18.1% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 26.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 44.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South solon vs Reading
- In Reading, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.7% in South solon.
- Depression is more prevalent in South solon at 24.2% compared to 23.1% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher smoking rate at 26.5% compared to 21.3% in South solon.
- Binge drinking is more common in South solon at 19.1% compared to 13.0% in Reading.
- Reading has higher obesity rates at 44.7% compared to 40.5% in South solon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Reading at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in South solon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South solon | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (1) | 2.6% (2,442) |
| High School Diploma | 41.0% (134) | 17.8% (16,896) |
| Less than High School | 21.4% (70) | 32.2% (30,522) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (25) | 6.9% (6,512) |
Education Levels Comparison: South solon vs Reading
- In Reading, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.3% in South solon.
- A higher percentage of residents in South solon hold a high school diploma at 41.0% compared to 17.8% in Reading.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Reading at 32.2%, compared to 21.4% in South solon.
- A higher percentage of residents in South solon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.6% compared to 6.9% in Reading.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.