Demographics details for South solon, OH vs Beaver dam, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South solon, OH vs Beaver dam, WI.

Data South solon Beaver dam
Population 327 16,582
Median Age 39.8 years 40.4 years
Median Income $56,563 $65,802
Married Families 48.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.1

Population Comparison: South solon vs Beaver dam

  • The population in Beaver dam is higher at 16,582, compared to 327 in South solon.
  • The median age in Beaver dam is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 39.8 years in South solon.
  • Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802, compared to $56,563 in South solon.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South solon at 48.0% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
  • South solon has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • The unemployment rate in South solon is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics South solon vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South solon Beaver dam
Black Data is updating 3
White 70 81
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 20 8
Two or More Races 10 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South solon vs Beaver dam

  • In Beaver dam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in South solon.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 70% in South solon.
  • In Beaver dam, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in South solon.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South solon at 20% compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South solon at 10% compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South solon and Beaver dam at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South solon Beaver dam
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 10.6%
Depression 24.2% 23.6%
Smoking 21.3% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 19.1% 23.5%
Obesity 40.5% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South solon vs Beaver dam

  • More residents in South solon report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South solon at 24.2% compared to 23.6% in Beaver dam.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in South solon at 21.3% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 19.1% in South solon.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South solon at 40.5% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South solon at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South solon Beaver dam
No Schooling 0.3% (1) 0.3% (47)
High School Diploma 41.0% (134) 23.8% (3,947)
Less than High School 21.4% (70) 10.3% (1,706)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.6% (25) 18.2% (3,023)

Education Levels Comparison: South solon vs Beaver dam

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both South solon and Beaver dam at 0.3%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South solon hold a high school diploma at 41.0% compared to 23.8% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents in South solon have less than a high school education at 21.4% compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
  • In Beaver dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 7.6% in South solon.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.