Environment details: South san francisco CA
Average quality amidst urban stresses.
Environment details: Wharton NJ
Good quality, few issues detected.
Compare Environment: South san francisco CA vs Wharton NJ
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | South san francisco | Wharton |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 2592 | 713 |
Water Quality | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | Average quality amidst urban stresses. | Good quality, few issues detected. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.93 | 1.78 |
Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 46 | 47 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: South san francisco vs Wharton
- The water quality in Wharton is superior at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in South san francisco.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in South san francisco with 1.93 compared to 1.78 in Wharton.
- Wharton experiences more days with poor air quality at 47 compared to 46 in South san francisco.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.