Demographics details for South san francisco, CA vs Clarendon, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South san francisco, CA vs Clarendon, TX.

Data South san francisco Clarendon
Population 63,484 1,948
Median Age 42.3 years 33.7 years
Median Income $127,062 $47,457
Married Families 44.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.5

Population Comparison: South san francisco vs Clarendon

  • In South san francisco, the population is higher at 63,484, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
  • Residents in South san francisco have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 33.7 years in Clarendon.
  • South san francisco has a higher median income of $127,062 compared to $47,457 in Clarendon.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South san francisco at 44.0% compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
  • The poverty level is higher in Clarendon at 10%, compared to 8% in South san francisco.
  • The unemployment rate in South san francisco is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Clarendon.

Demographics

Demographics South san francisco vs Clarendon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South san francisco Clarendon
Black 2 11
White 11 76
Asian 45 4
Hispanic 30 6
Two or More Races 11 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South san francisco vs Clarendon

  • In Clarendon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 2% in South san francisco.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarendon at 76% compared to 11% in South san francisco.
  • The Asian population is larger in South san francisco at 45% compared to 4% in Clarendon.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South san francisco at 30% compared to 6% in Clarendon.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South san francisco at 11% compared to 3% in Clarendon.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South san francisco at 1% compared to 0% in Clarendon.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South san francisco Clarendon
Mental Health Not Good 12.9% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 13.0%
Depression 13.7% 25.8%
Smoking 9.3% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 18.3%
Obesity 21.9% 38.4%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South san francisco vs Clarendon

  • In Clarendon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.9% in South san francisco.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clarendon at 25.8% versus 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • Clarendon has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 9.3% in South san francisco.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 14.5% in South san francisco.
  • Clarendon has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 21.9% in South san francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South san francisco at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South san francisco Clarendon
No Schooling 2.5% (1,583) 0.7% (14)
High School Diploma 13.7% (8,667) 11.4% (222)
Less than High School 14.8% (9,368) 17.6% (342)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.4% (19,273) 7.3% (142)

Education Levels Comparison: South san francisco vs Clarendon

  • A higher percentage of residents in South san francisco have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Clarendon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South san francisco hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarendon at 17.6%, compared to 14.8% in South san francisco.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South san francisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.