Demographics details for South san francisco, CA vs Barnegat, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South san francisco, CA vs Barnegat, NJ.

Data South san francisco Barnegat
Population 63,484 3,284
Median Age 42.3 years 41.1 years
Median Income $127,062 $98,621
Married Families 44.0% 56.0%
Poverty Level 8% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 3.8

Population Comparison: South san francisco vs Barnegat

  • In South san francisco, the population is higher at 63,484, compared to 3,284 in Barnegat.
  • Residents in South san francisco have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 41.1 years in Barnegat.
  • South san francisco has a higher median income of $127,062 compared to $98,621 in Barnegat.
  • In Barnegat, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 44.0% in South san francisco.
  • South san francisco has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 6% in Barnegat.
  • Barnegat has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.6% in South san francisco.

Demographics

Demographics South san francisco vs Barnegat provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South san francisco Barnegat
Black 2 Data is updating
White 11 86
Asian 45 2
Hispanic 30 10
Two or More Races 11 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South san francisco vs Barnegat

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South san francisco at 2% compared to 0% in Barnegat.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Barnegat at 86% compared to 11% in South san francisco.
  • The Asian population is larger in South san francisco at 45% compared to 2% in Barnegat.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South san francisco at 30% compared to 10% in Barnegat.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South san francisco at 11% compared to 2% in Barnegat.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South san francisco at 1% compared to 0% in Barnegat.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South san francisco Barnegat
Mental Health Not Good 12.9% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 11.4%
Depression 13.7% 23.7%
Smoking 9.3% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 17.4%
Obesity 21.9% 32.6%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South san francisco vs Barnegat

  • In Barnegat, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 12.9% in South san francisco.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Barnegat at 23.7% versus 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • Barnegat has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 9.3% in South san francisco.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Barnegat at 17.4% compared to 14.5% in South san francisco.
  • Barnegat has higher obesity rates at 32.6% compared to 21.9% in South san francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South san francisco at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Barnegat.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South san francisco Barnegat
No Schooling 2.5% (1,583) 0.6% (20)
High School Diploma 13.7% (8,667) 17.9% (588)
Less than High School 14.8% (9,368) 9.8% (322)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.4% (19,273) 30.5% (1,003)

Education Levels Comparison: South san francisco vs Barnegat

  • A higher percentage of residents in South san francisco have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Barnegat.
  • In Barnegat, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • More residents in South san francisco have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 9.8% in Barnegat.
  • In Barnegat, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 30.4% in South san francisco.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.