Demographics details for South salt lake, UT vs Woodstock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South salt lake, UT vs Woodstock, VA.
Data | South salt lake | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,003 | 5,907 |
Median Age | 31.3 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $57,125 | $64,470 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: South salt lake vs Woodstock
- In South salt lake, the population is higher at 26,003, compared to 5,907 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 31.3 years in South salt lake.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $64,470, compared to $57,125 in South salt lake.
- In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 28.0% in South salt lake.
- The poverty level is identical in both South salt lake and Woodstock at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in South salt lake is higher at 4.4%, compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics South salt lake vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South salt lake | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 6 |
White | 43 | 60 |
Asian | 10 | 4 |
Hispanic | 30 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South salt lake vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 5% in South salt lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 60% compared to 43% in South salt lake.
- The Asian population is larger in South salt lake at 10% compared to 4% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South salt lake at 30% compared to 19% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 11%, compared to 9% in South salt lake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South salt lake at 3% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South salt lake | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 12.3% |
Depression | 26.6% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 11.6% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South salt lake vs Woodstock
- More residents in South salt lake report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.9% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in South salt lake at 26.6% compared to 24.9% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 11.6% in South salt lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 14.6% in South salt lake.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 34.2% in South salt lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in South salt lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South salt lake | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (374) | 2.0% (118) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (4,185) | 19.0% (1,121) |
Less than High School | 16.8% (4,371) | 17.2% (1,018) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (4,906) | 16.4% (968) |
Education Levels Comparison: South salt lake vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.4% in South salt lake.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 16.1% in South salt lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 17.2%, compared to 16.8% in South salt lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 16.4% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.