Demographics details for South salt lake, UT vs Washington, DC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South salt lake, UT vs Washington, DC.

Data South salt lake Washington
Population 26,003 671,803
Median Age 31.3 years 34.8 years
Median Income $57,125 $101,722
Married Families 28.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 6.3

Population Comparison: South salt lake vs Washington

  • The population in Washington is higher at 671,803, compared to 26,003 in South salt lake.
  • The median age in Washington is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 31.3 years in South salt lake.
  • Washington has a higher median income of $101,722, compared to $57,125 in South salt lake.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South salt lake at 28.0% compared to 26.0% in Washington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Washington at 18%, compared to 10% in South salt lake.
  • Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.4% in South salt lake.

Demographics

Demographics South salt lake vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South salt lake Washington
Black 5 44
White 43 34
Asian 10 4
Hispanic 30 11
Two or More Races 9 7
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South salt lake vs Washington

  • In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 44% compared to 5% in South salt lake.
  • South salt lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 43% compared to 34% in Washington.
  • The Asian population is larger in South salt lake at 10% compared to 4% in Washington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South salt lake at 30% compared to 11% in Washington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South salt lake at 9% compared to 7% in Washington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South salt lake at 3% compared to 0% in Washington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South salt lake Washington
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 14.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 8.6%
Depression 26.6% 20.1%
Smoking 11.6% 12.4%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 20.7%
Obesity 34.2% 25.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South salt lake vs Washington

  • More residents in South salt lake report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South salt lake at 26.6% compared to 20.1% in Washington.
  • Washington has a higher smoking rate at 12.4% compared to 11.6% in South salt lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 20.7% compared to 14.6% in South salt lake.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South salt lake at 34.2% compared to 25.6% in Washington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South salt lake at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South salt lake Washington
No Schooling 1.4% (374) 0.9% (6,109)
High School Diploma 16.1% (4,185) 9.1% (61,269)
Less than High School 16.8% (4,371) 6.8% (45,577)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.9% (4,906) 45.2% (303,532)

Education Levels Comparison: South salt lake vs Washington

  • A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Washington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 9.1% in Washington.
  • More residents in South salt lake have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 6.8% in Washington.
  • In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.2% compared to 18.9% in South salt lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.