Demographics details for South salt lake, UT vs Janesville, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South salt lake, UT vs Janesville, WI.

Data South salt lake Janesville
Population 26,003 65,911
Median Age 31.3 years 39.5 years
Median Income $57,125 $68,610
Married Families 28.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 3.2

Population Comparison: South salt lake vs Janesville

  • The population in Janesville is higher at 65,911, compared to 26,003 in South salt lake.
  • The median age in Janesville is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 31.3 years in South salt lake.
  • Janesville has a higher median income of $68,610, compared to $57,125 in South salt lake.
  • In Janesville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 28.0% in South salt lake.
  • South salt lake has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Janesville.
  • The unemployment rate in South salt lake is higher at 4.4%, compared to 3.2% in Janesville.

Demographics

Demographics South salt lake vs Janesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South salt lake Janesville
Black 5 3
White 43 85
Asian 10 2
Hispanic 30 5
Two or More Races 9 5
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South salt lake vs Janesville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South salt lake at 5% compared to 3% in Janesville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Janesville at 85% compared to 43% in South salt lake.
  • The Asian population is larger in South salt lake at 10% compared to 2% in Janesville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South salt lake at 30% compared to 5% in Janesville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South salt lake at 9% compared to 5% in Janesville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South salt lake at 3% compared to 0% in Janesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South salt lake Janesville
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 10.2%
Depression 26.6% 25.1%
Smoking 11.6% 16.1%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 23.4%
Obesity 34.2% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South salt lake vs Janesville

  • More residents in South salt lake report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.8% in Janesville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South salt lake at 26.6% compared to 25.1% in Janesville.
  • Janesville has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 11.6% in South salt lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Janesville at 23.4% compared to 14.6% in South salt lake.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South salt lake at 34.2% compared to 34.1% in Janesville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Janesville at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in South salt lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South salt lake Janesville
No Schooling 1.4% (374) 0.5% (330)
High School Diploma 16.1% (4,185) 20.4% (13,471)
Less than High School 16.8% (4,371) 8.0% (5,276)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.9% (4,906) 18.1% (11,899)

Education Levels Comparison: South salt lake vs Janesville

  • A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Janesville.
  • In Janesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 16.1% in South salt lake.
  • More residents in South salt lake have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 8.0% in Janesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 18.1% in Janesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.