Demographics details for South salt lake, UT vs Hobart, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South salt lake, UT vs Hobart, IN.
| Data | South salt lake | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,003 | 29,458 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,125 | $69,398 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: South salt lake vs Hobart
- The population in Hobart is higher at 29,458, compared to 26,003 in South salt lake.
- The median age in Hobart is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 31.3 years in South salt lake.
- Hobart has a higher median income of $69,398, compared to $57,125 in South salt lake.
- In Hobart, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 28.0% in South salt lake.
- South salt lake has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.4% in South salt lake.
Demographics
Demographics South salt lake vs Hobart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South salt lake | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 11 |
| White | 43 | 63 |
| Asian | 10 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South salt lake vs Hobart
- In Hobart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 5% in South salt lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hobart at 63% compared to 43% in South salt lake.
- The Asian population is larger in South salt lake at 10% compared to 2% in Hobart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South salt lake at 30% compared to 17% in Hobart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South salt lake at 9% compared to 7% in Hobart.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South salt lake at 3% compared to 0% in Hobart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South salt lake | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 11.6% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South salt lake vs Hobart
- More residents in South salt lake report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.5% in Hobart.
- Depression is more prevalent in South salt lake at 26.6% compared to 24.5% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 11.6% in South salt lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hobart at 18.9% compared to 14.6% in South salt lake.
- Hobart has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 34.2% in South salt lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hobart at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in South salt lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South salt lake | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (374) | 0.7% (217) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (4,185) | 24.5% (7,227) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (4,371) | 8.2% (2,428) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (4,906) | 16.3% (4,813) |
Education Levels Comparison: South salt lake vs Hobart
- A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Hobart.
- In Hobart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 16.1% in South salt lake.
- More residents in South salt lake have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 8.2% in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 16.3% in Hobart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.