Demographics details for South salt lake, UT vs Fitzgerald, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South salt lake, UT vs Fitzgerald, GA.

Data South salt lake Fitzgerald
Population 26,003 8,900
Median Age 31.3 years 35.3 years
Median Income $57,125 $32,500
Married Families 28.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 10% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 4.5

Population Comparison: South salt lake vs Fitzgerald

  • In South salt lake, the population is higher at 26,003, compared to 8,900 in Fitzgerald.
  • The median age in Fitzgerald is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 31.3 years in South salt lake.
  • South salt lake has a higher median income of $57,125 compared to $32,500 in Fitzgerald.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South salt lake at 28.0% compared to 26.0% in Fitzgerald.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fitzgerald at 18%, compared to 10% in South salt lake.
  • Fitzgerald has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.4% in South salt lake.

Demographics

Demographics South salt lake vs Fitzgerald provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South salt lake Fitzgerald
Black 5 55
White 43 42
Asian 10 1
Hispanic 30 1
Two or More Races 9 1
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South salt lake vs Fitzgerald

  • In Fitzgerald, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 5% in South salt lake.
  • South salt lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 43% compared to 42% in Fitzgerald.
  • The Asian population is larger in South salt lake at 10% compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South salt lake at 30% compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South salt lake at 9% compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South salt lake at 3% compared to 0% in Fitzgerald.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South salt lake Fitzgerald
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 15.1%
Depression 26.6% 22.4%
Smoking 11.6% 22.9%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 13.4%
Obesity 34.2% 45.0%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South salt lake vs Fitzgerald

  • More residents in South salt lake report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.3% in Fitzgerald.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South salt lake at 26.6% compared to 22.4% in Fitzgerald.
  • Fitzgerald has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 11.6% in South salt lake.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South salt lake at 14.6% compared to 13.4% in Fitzgerald.
  • Fitzgerald has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 34.2% in South salt lake.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fitzgerald at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in South salt lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South salt lake Fitzgerald
No Schooling 1.4% (374) 0.5% (41)
High School Diploma 16.1% (4,185) 32.9% (2,930)
Less than High School 16.8% (4,371) 11.1% (992)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.9% (4,906) 9.3% (828)

Education Levels Comparison: South salt lake vs Fitzgerald

  • A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Fitzgerald.
  • In Fitzgerald, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.9% compared to 16.1% in South salt lake.
  • More residents in South salt lake have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 11.1% in Fitzgerald.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 9.3% in Fitzgerald.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.