Demographics details for South salt lake, UT vs Federal way, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South salt lake, UT vs Federal way, WA.

Data South salt lake Federal way
Population 26,003 97,863
Median Age 31.3 years 37.4 years
Median Income $57,125 $80,360
Married Families 28.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 5.7

Population Comparison: South salt lake vs Federal way

  • The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 26,003 in South salt lake.
  • The median age in Federal way is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 31.3 years in South salt lake.
  • Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360, compared to $57,125 in South salt lake.
  • In Federal way, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 28.0% in South salt lake.
  • South salt lake has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Federal way.
  • Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.4% in South salt lake.

Demographics

Demographics South salt lake vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South salt lake Federal way
Black 5 17
White 43 34
Asian 10 15
Hispanic 30 19
Two or More Races 9 14
American Indian 3 1

Demographics Comparison: South salt lake vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 5% in South salt lake.
  • South salt lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 43% compared to 34% in Federal way.
  • In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 10% in South salt lake.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South salt lake at 30% compared to 19% in Federal way.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 9% in South salt lake.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South salt lake at 3% compared to 1% in Federal way.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South salt lake Federal way
Mental Health Not Good 19.4% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 10.9%
Depression 26.6% 24.7%
Smoking 11.6% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 16.5%
Obesity 34.2% 27.2%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South salt lake vs Federal way

  • More residents in South salt lake report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.5% in Federal way.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South salt lake at 26.6% compared to 24.7% in Federal way.
  • Federal way has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 11.6% in South salt lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Federal way at 16.5% compared to 14.6% in South salt lake.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South salt lake at 34.2% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both South salt lake and Federal way at 12.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South salt lake Federal way
No Schooling 1.4% (374) 1.8% (1,735)
High School Diploma 16.1% (4,185) 15.3% (15,003)
Less than High School 16.8% (4,371) 11.0% (10,805)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.9% (4,906) 21.2% (20,761)

Education Levels Comparison: South salt lake vs Federal way

  • In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.4% in South salt lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South salt lake hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 15.3% in Federal way.
  • More residents in South salt lake have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 11.0% in Federal way.
  • In Federal way, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 18.9% in South salt lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.