Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Yankton, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Yankton, SD.
| Data | South river | Yankton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,990 | 15,534 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $95,981 | $60,180 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: South river vs Yankton
- In South river, the population is higher at 15,990, compared to 15,534 in Yankton.
- The median age in Yankton is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 37.1 years in South river.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $60,180 in Yankton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Yankton.
- The poverty level is higher in Yankton at 12%, compared to 8% in South river.
- The unemployment rate in South river is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Yankton.
Demographics
Demographics South river vs Yankton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South river | Yankton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 2 |
| White | 50 | 81 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 30 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: South river vs Yankton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South river at 7% compared to 2% in Yankton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Yankton at 81% compared to 50% in South river.
- The Asian population is larger in South river at 5% compared to 0% in Yankton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South river at 30% compared to 7% in Yankton.
- Both South river and Yankton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- In Yankton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in South river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South river | Yankton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 20.3% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 37.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Yankton
- More residents in South river report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 13.9% in Yankton.
- Depression is more prevalent in South river at 21.0% compared to 17.9% in Yankton.
- Yankton has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Yankton at 20.3% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Yankton has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yankton at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South river | Yankton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (394) | 0.5% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (2,985) | 16.8% (2,614) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (3,292) | 8.3% (1,290) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,025) | 20.7% (3,222) |
Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Yankton
- A higher percentage of residents in South river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.5% in Yankton.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 16.8% in Yankton.
- More residents in South river have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 8.3% in Yankton.
- In Yankton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 18.9% in South river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.