Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Wappingers falls, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Wappingers falls, NY.

Data South river Wappingers falls
Population 15,990 6,064
Median Age 37.1 years 47.9 years
Median Income $95,981 $61,554
Married Families 39.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: South river vs Wappingers falls

  • In South river, the population is higher at 15,990, compared to 6,064 in Wappingers falls.
  • The median age in Wappingers falls is higher at 47.9 years, compared to 37.1 years in South river.
  • South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $61,554 in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 32.0% in Wappingers falls.
  • South river has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Wappingers falls.
  • The unemployment rate in South river is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Wappingers falls.

Demographics

Demographics South river vs Wappingers falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South river Wappingers falls
Black 7 13
White 50 61
Asian 5 3
Hispanic 30 20
Two or More Races 7 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South river vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 7% in South river.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wappingers falls at 61% compared to 50% in South river.
  • The Asian population is larger in South river at 5% compared to 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South river at 30% compared to 20% in Wappingers falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South river at 7% compared to 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South river at 1% compared to 0% in Wappingers falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South river Wappingers falls
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 11.9%
Depression 21.0% 22.8%
Smoking 14.6% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 16.4%
Obesity 31.6% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.0% in South river.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wappingers falls at 22.8% versus 21.0% in South river.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 14.6% in South river.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wappingers falls at 16.4% compared to 16.0% in South river.
  • Wappingers falls has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 31.6% in South river.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wappingers falls at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South river Wappingers falls
No Schooling 2.5% (394) 0.9% (57)
High School Diploma 18.7% (2,985) 18.1% (1,099)
Less than High School 20.6% (3,292) 24.9% (1,511)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.9% (3,025) 14.2% (861)

Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Wappingers falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in South river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.9% in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 18.1% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wappingers falls at 24.9%, compared to 20.6% in South river.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in Wappingers falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.