Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Spokane, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Spokane, WA.
| Data | South river | Spokane |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,990 | 230,160 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $95,981 | $63,316 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: South river vs Spokane
- The population in Spokane is higher at 230,160, compared to 15,990 in South river.
- Residents in South river have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 37.0 years in Spokane.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $63,316 in Spokane.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Spokane.
- The poverty level is higher in Spokane at 12%, compared to 8% in South river.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both South river and Spokane at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics South river vs Spokane provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South river | Spokane |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 3 |
| White | 50 | 77 |
| Asian | 5 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South river vs Spokane
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South river at 7% compared to 3% in Spokane.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spokane at 77% compared to 50% in South river.
- The Asian population is larger in South river at 5% compared to 3% in Spokane.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South river at 30% compared to 7% in Spokane.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spokane at 9%, compared to 7% in South river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South river and Spokane at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South river | Spokane |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 15.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Spokane
- In Spokane, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spokane at 28.9% versus 21.0% in South river.
- Spokane has a higher smoking rate at 15.9% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spokane at 17.8% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Obesity rates are higher in South river at 31.6% compared to 30.4% in Spokane.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spokane at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South river | Spokane |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (394) | 0.7% (1,705) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (2,985) | 12.2% (28,084) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (3,292) | 8.4% (19,336) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,025) | 22.6% (52,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Spokane
- A higher percentage of residents in South river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Spokane.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 12.2% in Spokane.
- More residents in South river have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 8.4% in Spokane.
- In Spokane, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.6% compared to 18.9% in South river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.