Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Sacramento, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Sacramento, CA.
| Data | South river | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,990 | 528,001 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $95,981 | $78,954 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: South river vs Sacramento
- The population in Sacramento is higher at 528,001, compared to 15,990 in South river.
- Residents in South river have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $78,954 in Sacramento.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Sacramento.
- The poverty level is higher in Sacramento at 12%, compared to 8% in South river.
- Sacramento has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics South river vs Sacramento provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South river | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 12 |
| White | 50 | 26 |
| Asian | 5 | 19 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South river vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 7% in South river.
- South river has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 5% in South river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South river at 30% compared to 29% in Sacramento.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sacramento at 13%, compared to 7% in South river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South river and Sacramento at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South river | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Depression is more prevalent in South river at 21.0% compared to 18.3% in Sacramento.
- Smoking is more prevalent in South river at 14.6% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
- Binge drinking is more common in South river at 16.0% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
- Sacramento has higher obesity rates at 32.7% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- Disability percentages are the same in both South river and Sacramento at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South river | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (394) | 2.7% (14,512) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (2,985) | 11.7% (62,039) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (3,292) | 14.7% (77,760) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,025) | 24.4% (128,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.5% in South river.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
- More residents in South river have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 14.7% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 18.9% in South river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.