Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Mountain grove, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Mountain grove, MO.
Data | South river | Mountain grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,990 | 4,551 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 42.3 years |
Median Income | $95,981 | $38,103 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: South river vs Mountain grove
- In South river, the population is higher at 15,990, compared to 4,551 in Mountain grove.
- The median age in Mountain grove is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 37.1 years in South river.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $38,103 in Mountain grove.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Mountain grove.
- The poverty level is higher in Mountain grove at 15%, compared to 8% in South river.
- Mountain grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics South river vs Mountain grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South river | Mountain grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | Data is updating |
White | 50 | 89 |
Asian | 5 | 1 |
Hispanic | 30 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South river vs Mountain grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South river at 7% compared to 0% in Mountain grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mountain grove at 89% compared to 50% in South river.
- The Asian population is larger in South river at 5% compared to 1% in Mountain grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South river at 30% compared to 2% in Mountain grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mountain grove at 8%, compared to 7% in South river.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South river at 1% compared to 0% in Mountain grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South river | Mountain grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 22.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 18.1% |
Depression | 21.0% | 28.4% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 31.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 31.6% | 44.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Mountain grove
- In Mountain grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mountain grove at 28.4% versus 21.0% in South river.
- Mountain grove has a higher smoking rate at 31.2% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- Binge drinking is more common in South river at 16.0% compared to 14.8% in Mountain grove.
- Mountain grove has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain grove at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South river | Mountain grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (394) | 0.6% (26) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (2,985) | 27.6% (1,256) |
Less than High School | 20.6% (3,292) | 23.2% (1,057) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,025) | 8.8% (400) |
Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Mountain grove
- A higher percentage of residents in South river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Mountain grove.
- In Mountain grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 18.7% in South river.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mountain grove at 23.2%, compared to 20.6% in South river.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 8.8% in Mountain grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.