Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Luna pier, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Luna pier, MI.
| Data | South river | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,990 | 1,367 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 52.1 years |
| Median Income | $95,981 | $48,073 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: South river vs Luna pier
- In South river, the population is higher at 15,990, compared to 1,367 in Luna pier.
- The median age in Luna pier is higher at 52.1 years, compared to 37.1 years in South river.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $48,073 in Luna pier.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Luna pier.
- The poverty level is higher in Luna pier at 9%, compared to 8% in South river.
- The unemployment rate in South river is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Luna pier.
Demographics
Demographics South river vs Luna pier provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South river | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 1 |
| White | 50 | 92 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South river vs Luna pier
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South river at 7% compared to 1% in Luna pier.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Luna pier at 92% compared to 50% in South river.
- The Asian population is larger in South river at 5% compared to 1% in Luna pier.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South river at 30% compared to 1% in Luna pier.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South river at 7% compared to 5% in Luna pier.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South river at 1% compared to 0% in Luna pier.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South river | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 42.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Luna pier
- In Luna pier, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Luna pier at 25.5% versus 21.0% in South river.
- Luna pier has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Luna pier at 18.4% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Luna pier has higher obesity rates at 42.5% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Luna pier at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South river | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (394) | 0.7% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (2,985) | 20.4% (279) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (3,292) | 7.5% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,025) | 12.7% (174) |
Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Luna pier
- A higher percentage of residents in South river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Luna pier.
- In Luna pier, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 18.7% in South river.
- More residents in South river have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 7.5% in Luna pier.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 12.7% in Luna pier.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.