Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | South river | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,990 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $95,981 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: South river vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 15,990 in South river.
- Residents in South river have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $71,367 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 8% in South river.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics South river vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South river | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 21 |
| White | 50 | 10 |
| Asian | 5 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South river vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 7% in South river.
- South river has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in South river at 5% compared to 4% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 30% in South river.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 7% in South river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South river and Lancaster at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South river | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Depression is more prevalent in South river at 21.0% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- Binge drinking is more common in South river at 16.0% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- Disability percentages are higher in South river at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South river | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (394) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (2,985) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (3,292) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,025) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in South river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 2.0% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 20.6% in South river.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.