Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Jasper, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Jasper, GA.
| Data | South river | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,990 | 15,951 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 42.2 years |
| Median Income | $95,981 | $57,374 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: South river vs Jasper
- In South river, the population is higher at 15,990, compared to 15,951 in Jasper.
- The median age in Jasper is higher at 42.2 years, compared to 37.1 years in South river.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $57,374 in Jasper.
- In Jasper, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in South river.
- The poverty level is higher in Jasper at 12%, compared to 8% in South river.
- The unemployment rate in South river is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Jasper.
Demographics
Demographics South river vs Jasper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South river | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 17 |
| White | 50 | 76 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 30 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South river vs Jasper
- In Jasper, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 7% in South river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jasper at 76% compared to 50% in South river.
- The Asian population is larger in South river at 5% compared to 0% in Jasper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South river at 30% compared to 4% in Jasper.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South river at 7% compared to 3% in Jasper.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South river at 1% compared to 0% in Jasper.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South river | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jasper at 22.4% versus 21.0% in South river.
- Jasper has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- Binge drinking is more common in South river at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Jasper.
- Jasper has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jasper at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South river | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (394) | 0.8% (120) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (2,985) | 23.8% (3,793) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (3,292) | 11.3% (1,800) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,025) | 11.8% (1,876) |
Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Jasper
- A higher percentage of residents in South river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.8% in Jasper.
- In Jasper, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 18.7% in South river.
- More residents in South river have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 11.3% in Jasper.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 11.8% in Jasper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.