Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Dryden, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Dryden, VA.
| Data | South river | Dryden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,990 | 684 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $95,981 | $52,054 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: South river vs Dryden
- In South river, the population is higher at 15,990, compared to 684 in Dryden.
- The median age in Dryden is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 37.1 years in South river.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $52,054 in Dryden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 30.0% in Dryden.
- The poverty level is higher in Dryden at 10%, compared to 8% in South river.
- Dryden has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics South river vs Dryden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South river | Dryden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | Data is updating |
| White | 50 | 99 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 30 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South river vs Dryden
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South river at 7% compared to 0% in Dryden.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dryden at 99% compared to 50% in South river.
- The Asian population is larger in South river at 5% compared to 0% in Dryden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South river at 30% compared to 1% in Dryden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South river at 7% compared to 0% in Dryden.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South river at 1% compared to 0% in Dryden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South river | Dryden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 20.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Dryden
- In Dryden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dryden at 27.8% versus 21.0% in South river.
- Dryden has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dryden at 16.9% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Dryden has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dryden at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South river | Dryden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (394) | 3.5% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (2,985) | 14.2% (97) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (3,292) | 13.5% (92) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,025) | 11.5% (79) |
Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Dryden
- In Dryden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in South river.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 14.2% in Dryden.
- More residents in South river have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 13.5% in Dryden.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 11.5% in Dryden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.