Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Copperas cove, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Copperas cove, TX.

Data South river Copperas cove
Population 15,990 37,964
Median Age 37.1 years 31.7 years
Median Income $95,981 $64,798
Married Families 39.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 8% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.8

Population Comparison: South river vs Copperas cove

  • The population in Copperas cove is higher at 37,964, compared to 15,990 in South river.
  • Residents in South river have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 31.7 years in Copperas cove.
  • South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $64,798 in Copperas cove.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in Copperas cove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Copperas cove at 11%, compared to 8% in South river.
  • Copperas cove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.2% in South river.

Demographics

Demographics South river vs Copperas cove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South river Copperas cove
Black 7 15
White 50 47
Asian 5 2
Hispanic 30 19
Two or More Races 7 17
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South river vs Copperas cove

  • In Copperas cove, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 7% in South river.
  • South river has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 47% in Copperas cove.
  • The Asian population is larger in South river at 5% compared to 2% in Copperas cove.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South river at 30% compared to 19% in Copperas cove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Copperas cove at 17%, compared to 7% in South river.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South river at 1% compared to 0% in Copperas cove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South river Copperas cove
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 12.0%
Depression 21.0% 24.9%
Smoking 14.6% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 17.8%
Obesity 31.6% 41.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Copperas cove

  • In Copperas cove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.0% in South river.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Copperas cove at 24.9% versus 21.0% in South river.
  • Copperas cove has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 14.6% in South river.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Copperas cove at 17.8% compared to 16.0% in South river.
  • Copperas cove has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 31.6% in South river.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Copperas cove at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South river Copperas cove
No Schooling 2.5% (394) 0.5% (200)
High School Diploma 18.7% (2,985) 12.8% (4,867)
Less than High School 20.6% (3,292) 6.8% (2,567)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.9% (3,025) 12.5% (4,756)

Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Copperas cove

  • A higher percentage of residents in South river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.5% in Copperas cove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 12.8% in Copperas cove.
  • More residents in South river have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 6.8% in Copperas cove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 12.5% in Copperas cove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.