Environment details: South river NJ
Acceptable quality; few minor pollutants detected.
Environment details: Azusa CA
Good quality, managed with good practices.
Compare Environment: South river NJ vs Azusa CA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | South river | Azusa |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 713 | 2592 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Acceptable quality; few minor pollutants detected. | Good quality, managed with good practices. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.93 | 2.85 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 68 | 176 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: South river vs Azusa
- The water quality in Azusa is superior at 7/10 compared to 6/10 in South river.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Azusa with an average index of 2.85 compared to 1.93 in South river.
- Azusa experiences more days with poor air quality at 176 compared to 68 in South river.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.