Demographics details for South river, NJ vs Arlington, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South river, NJ vs Arlington, TX.
Data | South river | Arlington |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,990 | 394,602 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 33.1 years |
Median Income | $95,981 | $71,736 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: South river vs Arlington
- The population in Arlington is higher at 394,602, compared to 15,990 in South river.
- Residents in South river have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 33.1 years in Arlington.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981 compared to $71,736 in Arlington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South river at 39.0% compared to 36.0% in Arlington.
- The poverty level is higher in Arlington at 10%, compared to 8% in South river.
- Arlington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics South river vs Arlington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South river | Arlington |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 23 |
White | 50 | 25 |
Asian | 5 | 7 |
Hispanic | 30 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 14 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South river vs Arlington
- In Arlington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 7% in South river.
- South river has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 25% in Arlington.
- In Arlington, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 5% in South river.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both South river and Arlington at 30%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arlington at 14%, compared to 7% in South river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South river and Arlington at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South river | Arlington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.7% |
Depression | 21.0% | 22.3% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 15.8% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 31.6% | 35.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South river vs Arlington
- In Arlington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arlington at 22.3% versus 21.0% in South river.
- Arlington has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arlington at 16.2% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Arlington has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- Disability percentages are higher in South river at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Arlington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South river | Arlington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (394) | 1.8% (6,992) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (2,985) | 12.4% (48,867) |
Less than High School | 20.6% (3,292) | 15.6% (61,670) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (3,025) | 20.3% (80,261) |
Education Levels Comparison: South river vs Arlington
- A higher percentage of residents in South river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.8% in Arlington.
- A higher percentage of residents in South river hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 12.4% in Arlington.
- More residents in South river have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 15.6% in Arlington.
- In Arlington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 18.9% in South river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.