Demographics details for South portland, ME vs Sheboygan, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South portland, ME vs Sheboygan, WI.

Data South portland Sheboygan
Population 27,026 49,773
Median Age 41.0 years 37.0 years
Median Income $82,489 $59,861
Married Families 38.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 7% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.4 3.0

Population Comparison: South portland vs Sheboygan

  • The population in Sheboygan is higher at 49,773, compared to 27,026 in South portland.
  • Residents in South portland have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 37.0 years in Sheboygan.
  • South portland has a higher median income of $82,489 compared to $59,861 in Sheboygan.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South portland at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Sheboygan.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sheboygan at 10%, compared to 7% in South portland.
  • Sheboygan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.0% compared to 2.4% in South portland.

Demographics

Demographics South portland vs Sheboygan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South portland Sheboygan
Black 7 3
White 83 65
Asian 2 12
Hispanic 3 12
Two or More Races 5 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South portland vs Sheboygan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South portland at 7% compared to 3% in Sheboygan.
  • South portland has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 65% in Sheboygan.
  • In Sheboygan, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in South portland.
  • Sheboygan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in South portland.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sheboygan at 8%, compared to 5% in South portland.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South portland and Sheboygan at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South portland Sheboygan
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.5% 9.9%
Depression 23.8% 21.5%
Smoking 12.2% 16.3%
Binge Drinking 20.1% 22.8%
Obesity 26.2% 33.1%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South portland vs Sheboygan

  • More residents in South portland report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 14.6% in Sheboygan.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South portland at 23.8% compared to 21.5% in Sheboygan.
  • Sheboygan has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sheboygan at 22.8% compared to 20.1% in South portland.
  • Sheboygan has higher obesity rates at 33.1% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South portland at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Sheboygan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South portland Sheboygan
No Schooling 0.3% (93) 1.5% (745)
High School Diploma 13.2% (3,562) 18.9% (9,403)
Less than High School 4.4% (1,202) 9.9% (4,918)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.5% (9,604) 15.3% (7,616)

Education Levels Comparison: South portland vs Sheboygan

  • In Sheboygan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in South portland.
  • In Sheboygan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sheboygan at 9.9%, compared to 4.4% in South portland.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South portland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 15.3% in Sheboygan.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.