Demographics details for South portland, ME vs Richmond, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South portland, ME vs Richmond, MO.
Data | South portland | Richmond |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,026 | 5,959 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 39.9 years |
Median Income | $82,489 | $61,694 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: South portland vs Richmond
- In South portland, the population is higher at 27,026, compared to 5,959 in Richmond.
- Residents in South portland have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 39.9 years in Richmond.
- South portland has a higher median income of $82,489 compared to $61,694 in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South portland at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Richmond.
- The poverty level is higher in Richmond at 10%, compared to 7% in South portland.
- Richmond has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.4% in South portland.
Demographics
Demographics South portland vs Richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South portland | Richmond |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 2 |
White | 83 | 90 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South portland vs Richmond
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South portland at 7% compared to 2% in Richmond.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Richmond at 90% compared to 83% in South portland.
- The Asian population is larger in South portland at 2% compared to 0% in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in South portland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South portland at 5% compared to 2% in Richmond.
- In Richmond, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in South portland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South portland | Richmond |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 13.6% |
Depression | 23.8% | 26.0% |
Smoking | 12.2% | 23.7% |
Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 26.2% | 37.3% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South portland vs Richmond
- In Richmond, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richmond at 26.0% versus 23.8% in South portland.
- Richmond has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
- Binge drinking is more common in South portland at 20.1% compared to 17.4% in Richmond.
- Richmond has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richmond at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in South portland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South portland | Richmond |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (93) | 0.3% (17) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (3,562) | 32.1% (1,910) |
Less than High School | 4.4% (1,202) | 15.1% (898) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.5% (9,604) | 6.8% (407) |
Education Levels Comparison: South portland vs Richmond
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both South portland and Richmond at 0.3%.
- In Richmond, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.1% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richmond at 15.1%, compared to 4.4% in South portland.
- A higher percentage of residents in South portland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 6.8% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.