Demographics details for South portland, ME vs Pasadena, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South portland, ME vs Pasadena, TX.
Data | South portland | Pasadena |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,026 | 147,662 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 32.6 years |
Median Income | $82,489 | $64,698 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: South portland vs Pasadena
- The population in Pasadena is higher at 147,662, compared to 27,026 in South portland.
- Residents in South portland have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 32.6 years in Pasadena.
- South portland has a higher median income of $82,489 compared to $64,698 in Pasadena.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South portland at 38.0% compared to 37.0% in Pasadena.
- The poverty level is higher in Pasadena at 12%, compared to 7% in South portland.
- Pasadena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 2.4% in South portland.
Demographics
Demographics South portland vs Pasadena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South portland | Pasadena |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 3 |
White | 83 | -1 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 72 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 23 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South portland vs Pasadena
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South portland at 7% compared to 3% in Pasadena.
- South portland has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to -1% in Pasadena.
- Both South portland and Pasadena have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Pasadena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 72%, compared to 3% in South portland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pasadena at 23%, compared to 5% in South portland.
- In Pasadena, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in South portland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South portland | Pasadena |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 13.3% |
Depression | 23.8% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 12.2% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 26.2% | 37.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South portland vs Pasadena
- In Pasadena, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
- Depression is more prevalent in South portland at 23.8% compared to 21.7% in Pasadena.
- Pasadena has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
- Binge drinking is more common in South portland at 20.1% compared to 18.1% in Pasadena.
- Pasadena has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
- Disability percentages are higher in South portland at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Pasadena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South portland | Pasadena |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (93) | 3.0% (4,357) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (3,562) | 16.2% (23,948) |
Less than High School | 4.4% (1,202) | 33.1% (48,806) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.5% (9,604) | 9.9% (14,596) |
Education Levels Comparison: South portland vs Pasadena
- In Pasadena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.3% in South portland.
- In Pasadena, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pasadena at 33.1%, compared to 4.4% in South portland.
- A higher percentage of residents in South portland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 9.9% in Pasadena.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.