Demographics details for South portland, ME vs Gallitzin, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South portland, ME vs Gallitzin, PA.

Data South portland Gallitzin
Population 27,026 1,508
Median Age 41.0 years 39.4 years
Median Income $82,489 $52,500
Married Families 38.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 7% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.4 5.2

Population Comparison: South portland vs Gallitzin

  • In South portland, the population is higher at 27,026, compared to 1,508 in Gallitzin.
  • Residents in South portland have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 39.4 years in Gallitzin.
  • South portland has a higher median income of $82,489 compared to $52,500 in Gallitzin.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South portland at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Gallitzin.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gallitzin at 12%, compared to 7% in South portland.
  • Gallitzin has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.4% in South portland.

Demographics

Demographics South portland vs Gallitzin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South portland Gallitzin
Black 7 Data is updating
White 83 93
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South portland vs Gallitzin

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South portland at 7% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallitzin at 93% compared to 83% in South portland.
  • The Asian population is larger in South portland at 2% compared to 0% in Gallitzin.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both South portland and Gallitzin at 3%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South portland at 5% compared to 4% in Gallitzin.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South portland and Gallitzin at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South portland Gallitzin
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 8.5% 12.1%
Depression 23.8% 25.2%
Smoking 12.2% 20.9%
Binge Drinking 20.1% 18.5%
Obesity 26.2% 38.6%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South portland vs Gallitzin

  • In Gallitzin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Gallitzin at 25.2% versus 23.8% in South portland.
  • Gallitzin has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South portland at 20.1% compared to 18.5% in Gallitzin.
  • Gallitzin has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallitzin at 22.0% compared to 13.0% in South portland.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South portland Gallitzin
No Schooling 0.3% (93) 1.1% (16)
High School Diploma 13.2% (3,562) 29.8% (449)
Less than High School 4.4% (1,202) 20.6% (310)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.5% (9,604) 9.9% (150)

Education Levels Comparison: South portland vs Gallitzin

  • In Gallitzin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in South portland.
  • In Gallitzin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.8% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallitzin at 20.6%, compared to 4.4% in South portland.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South portland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 9.9% in Gallitzin.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.