Demographics details for South portland, ME vs Clayton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South portland, ME vs Clayton, OH.
Data | South portland | Clayton |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,026 | 13,235 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 46.0 years |
Median Income | $82,489 | $89,282 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: South portland vs Clayton
- In South portland, the population is higher at 27,026, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 41.0 years in South portland.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282, compared to $82,489 in South portland.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 38.0% in South portland.
- The poverty level is higher in Clayton at 10%, compared to 7% in South portland.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.4% in South portland.
Demographics
Demographics South portland vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South portland | Clayton |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 30 |
White | 83 | 61 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South portland vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 7% in South portland.
- South portland has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- Both South portland and Clayton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South portland at 3% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- Both South portland and Clayton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South portland and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South portland | Clayton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 10.3% |
Depression | 23.8% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 12.2% | 15.3% |
Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 26.2% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South portland vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 24.4% versus 23.8% in South portland.
- Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
- Binge drinking is more common in South portland at 20.1% compared to 18.9% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
- Disability percentages are the same in both South portland and Clayton at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South portland | Clayton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (93) | 0.2% (30) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (3,562) | 17.9% (2,371) |
Less than High School | 4.4% (1,202) | 5.6% (746) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.5% (9,604) | 26.3% (3,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: South portland vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in South portland have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 5.6%, compared to 4.4% in South portland.
- A higher percentage of residents in South portland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 26.3% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.