Demographics details for South plainfield, NJ vs Roseville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South plainfield, NJ vs Roseville, CA.
Data | South plainfield | Roseville |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,228 | 154,817 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 39.8 years |
Median Income | $123,417 | $112,265 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: South plainfield vs Roseville
- The population in Roseville is higher at 154,817, compared to 24,228 in South plainfield.
- Residents in South plainfield have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 39.8 years in Roseville.
- South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417 compared to $112,265 in Roseville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South plainfield at 50.0% compared to 42.0% in Roseville.
- The poverty level is higher in Roseville at 8%, compared to 6% in South plainfield.
- The unemployment rate in South plainfield is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Roseville.
Demographics
Demographics South plainfield vs Roseville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South plainfield | Roseville |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 2 |
White | 46 | 61 |
Asian | 17 | 12 |
Hispanic | 18 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South plainfield vs Roseville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South plainfield at 12% compared to 2% in Roseville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Roseville at 61% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
- The Asian population is larger in South plainfield at 17% compared to 12% in Roseville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South plainfield at 18% compared to 15% in Roseville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Roseville at 10%, compared to 7% in South plainfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South plainfield and Roseville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South plainfield | Roseville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 9.4% |
Depression | 19.0% | 19.2% |
Smoking | 12.0% | 10.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 18.1% |
Obesity | 29.0% | 26.4% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South plainfield vs Roseville
- In Roseville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Roseville at 19.2% versus 19.0% in South plainfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in South plainfield at 12.0% compared to 10.5% in Roseville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Roseville at 18.1% compared to 15.2% in South plainfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in South plainfield at 29.0% compared to 26.4% in Roseville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roseville at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South plainfield | Roseville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (328) | 0.7% (1,136) |
High School Diploma | 16.6% (4,012) | 9.2% (14,170) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (2,175) | 5.4% (8,299) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.5% (7,629) | 29.7% (45,932) |
Education Levels Comparison: South plainfield vs Roseville
- A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Roseville.
- A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 9.2% in Roseville.
- More residents in South plainfield have less than a high school education at 9.0% compared to 5.4% in Roseville.
- A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 29.7% in Roseville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.