Demographics details for South plainfield, NJ vs Raeford, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South plainfield, NJ vs Raeford, NC.

Data South plainfield Raeford
Population 24,228 4,529
Median Age 41.8 years 38.5 years
Median Income $123,417 $38,371
Married Families 50.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 6% 20%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.2

Population Comparison: South plainfield vs Raeford

  • In South plainfield, the population is higher at 24,228, compared to 4,529 in Raeford.
  • Residents in South plainfield have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 38.5 years in Raeford.
  • South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417 compared to $38,371 in Raeford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South plainfield at 50.0% compared to 27.0% in Raeford.
  • The poverty level is higher in Raeford at 20%, compared to 6% in South plainfield.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both South plainfield and Raeford at 4.2%.

Demographics

Demographics South plainfield vs Raeford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South plainfield Raeford
Black 12 46
White 46 30
Asian 17 Data is updating
Hispanic 18 8
Two or More Races 7 10
American Indian Data is updating 6

Demographics Comparison: South plainfield vs Raeford

  • In Raeford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 46% compared to 12% in South plainfield.
  • South plainfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 30% in Raeford.
  • The Asian population is larger in South plainfield at 17% compared to 0% in Raeford.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South plainfield at 18% compared to 8% in Raeford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Raeford at 10%, compared to 7% in South plainfield.
  • In Raeford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 0% in South plainfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South plainfield Raeford
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 14.1%
Depression 19.0% 23.7%
Smoking 12.0% 22.1%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 14.7%
Obesity 29.0% 41.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South plainfield vs Raeford

  • In Raeford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Raeford at 23.7% versus 19.0% in South plainfield.
  • Raeford has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 12.0% in South plainfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South plainfield at 15.2% compared to 14.7% in Raeford.
  • Raeford has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 29.0% in South plainfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Raeford at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South plainfield Raeford
No Schooling 1.4% (328) 1.0% (46)
High School Diploma 16.6% (4,012) 19.1% (866)
Less than High School 9.0% (2,175) 17.0% (768)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.5% (7,629) 13.2% (599)

Education Levels Comparison: South plainfield vs Raeford

  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Raeford.
  • In Raeford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 16.6% in South plainfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Raeford at 17.0%, compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 13.2% in Raeford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.