Demographics details for South plainfield, NJ vs Onalaska, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South plainfield, NJ vs Onalaska, TX.

Data South plainfield Onalaska
Population 24,228 3,205
Median Age 41.8 years 45.2 years
Median Income $123,417 $56,168
Married Families 50.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.5

Population Comparison: South plainfield vs Onalaska

  • In South plainfield, the population is higher at 24,228, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
  • The median age in Onalaska is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 41.8 years in South plainfield.
  • South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417 compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South plainfield at 50.0% compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
  • The poverty level is higher in Onalaska at 12%, compared to 6% in South plainfield.
  • Onalaska has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in South plainfield.

Demographics

Demographics South plainfield vs Onalaska provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South plainfield Onalaska
Black 12 1
White 46 91
Asian 17 Data is updating
Hispanic 18 3
Two or More Races 7 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South plainfield vs Onalaska

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South plainfield at 12% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Onalaska at 91% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in South plainfield at 17% compared to 0% in Onalaska.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South plainfield at 18% compared to 3% in Onalaska.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South plainfield at 7% compared to 5% in Onalaska.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South plainfield and Onalaska at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South plainfield Onalaska
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 12.5%
Depression 19.0% 26.0%
Smoking 12.0% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 19.4%
Obesity 29.0% 39.9%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South plainfield vs Onalaska

  • In Onalaska, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Onalaska at 26.0% versus 19.0% in South plainfield.
  • Onalaska has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 12.0% in South plainfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 15.2% in South plainfield.
  • Onalaska has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 29.0% in South plainfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South plainfield Onalaska
No Schooling 1.4% (328) 0.7% (21)
High School Diploma 16.6% (4,012) 15.3% (491)
Less than High School 9.0% (2,175) 21.5% (689)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.5% (7,629) 5.0% (161)

Education Levels Comparison: South plainfield vs Onalaska

  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Onalaska.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Onalaska at 21.5%, compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.