Demographics details for South plainfield, NJ vs Meade, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South plainfield, NJ vs Meade, KS.
Data | South plainfield | Meade |
---|---|---|
Population | 24,228 | 3,897 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 37.7 years |
Median Income | $123,417 | $74,063 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: South plainfield vs Meade
- In South plainfield, the population is higher at 24,228, compared to 3,897 in Meade.
- Residents in South plainfield have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 37.7 years in Meade.
- South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417 compared to $74,063 in Meade.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South plainfield at 50.0% compared to 46.0% in Meade.
- The poverty level is higher in Meade at 9%, compared to 6% in South plainfield.
- The unemployment rate in South plainfield is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.9% in Meade.
Demographics
Demographics South plainfield vs Meade provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South plainfield | Meade |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 1 |
White | 46 | 69 |
Asian | 17 | 1 |
Hispanic | 18 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South plainfield vs Meade
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South plainfield at 12% compared to 1% in Meade.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Meade at 69% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
- The Asian population is larger in South plainfield at 17% compared to 1% in Meade.
- Meade has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 18% in South plainfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South plainfield at 7% compared to 6% in Meade.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South plainfield and Meade at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South plainfield | Meade |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 10.8% |
Depression | 19.0% | 20.0% |
Smoking | 12.0% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 29.0% | 40.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South plainfield vs Meade
- In Meade, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meade at 20.0% versus 19.0% in South plainfield.
- Meade has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 12.0% in South plainfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Meade at 18.8% compared to 15.2% in South plainfield.
- Meade has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 29.0% in South plainfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meade at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South plainfield | Meade |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (328) | 0.2% (9) |
High School Diploma | 16.6% (4,012) | 13.7% (532) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (2,175) | 18.0% (701) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.5% (7,629) | 15.9% (619) |
Education Levels Comparison: South plainfield vs Meade
- A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Meade.
- A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 13.7% in Meade.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Meade at 18.0%, compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 15.9% in Meade.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.