Demographics details for South plainfield, NJ vs Folsom, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South plainfield, NJ vs Folsom, CA.
| Data | South plainfield | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,228 | 83,269 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $123,417 | $134,935 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: South plainfield vs Folsom
- The population in Folsom is higher at 83,269, compared to 24,228 in South plainfield.
- Residents in South plainfield have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 39.9 years in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935, compared to $123,417 in South plainfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South plainfield at 50.0% compared to 44.0% in Folsom.
- The poverty level is higher in Folsom at 7%, compared to 6% in South plainfield.
- The unemployment rate in South plainfield is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.8% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics South plainfield vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South plainfield | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 4 |
| White | 46 | 54 |
| Asian | 17 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South plainfield vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South plainfield at 12% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Folsom at 54% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
- In Folsom, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 17% in South plainfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South plainfield at 18% compared to 14% in Folsom.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Folsom at 10%, compared to 7% in South plainfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South plainfield and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South plainfield | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 9.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 29.0% | 28.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South plainfield vs Folsom
- More residents in South plainfield report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in South plainfield at 19.0% compared to 17.7% in Folsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in South plainfield at 12.0% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in South plainfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in South plainfield at 29.0% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in South plainfield at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South plainfield | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (328) | 0.5% (451) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (4,012) | 7.7% (6,439) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (2,175) | 6.1% (5,119) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.5% (7,629) | 36.4% (30,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: South plainfield vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- More residents in South plainfield have less than a high school education at 9.0% compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 31.5% in South plainfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.