Demographics details for South plainfield, NJ vs Dexter, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South plainfield, NJ vs Dexter, MN.

Data South plainfield Dexter
Population 24,228 323
Median Age 41.8 years 45.8 years
Median Income $123,417 $84,375
Married Families 50.0% 59.0%
Poverty Level 6% 7%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: South plainfield vs Dexter

  • In South plainfield, the population is higher at 24,228, compared to 323 in Dexter.
  • The median age in Dexter is higher at 45.8 years, compared to 41.8 years in South plainfield.
  • South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417 compared to $84,375 in Dexter.
  • In Dexter, the percentage of married families is higher at 59.0%, compared to 50.0% in South plainfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Dexter at 7%, compared to 6% in South plainfield.
  • The unemployment rate in South plainfield is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Dexter.

Demographics

Demographics South plainfield vs Dexter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South plainfield Dexter
Black 12 Data is updating
White 46 100
Asian 17 Data is updating
Hispanic 18 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South plainfield vs Dexter

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South plainfield at 12% compared to 0% in Dexter.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Dexter at 100% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in South plainfield at 17% compared to 0% in Dexter.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South plainfield at 18% compared to 0% in Dexter.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South plainfield at 7% compared to 0% in Dexter.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South plainfield and Dexter at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South plainfield Dexter
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 9.4%
Depression 19.0% 22.6%
Smoking 12.0% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 20.4%
Obesity 29.0% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South plainfield vs Dexter

  • In Dexter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Dexter at 22.6% versus 19.0% in South plainfield.
  • Dexter has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 12.0% in South plainfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Dexter at 20.4% compared to 15.2% in South plainfield.
  • Dexter has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 29.0% in South plainfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dexter at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South plainfield Dexter
No Schooling 1.4% (328) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.6% (4,012) 31.0% (100)
Less than High School 9.0% (2,175) 9.3% (30)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.5% (7,629) 7.1% (23)

Education Levels Comparison: South plainfield vs Dexter

  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Dexter.
  • In Dexter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.0% compared to 16.6% in South plainfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dexter at 9.3%, compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 7.1% in Dexter.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.