Demographics details for South plainfield, NJ vs Corwith, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South plainfield, NJ vs Corwith, IA.

Data South plainfield Corwith
Population 24,228 265
Median Age 41.8 years 48.9 years
Median Income $123,417 $48,125
Married Families 50.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 6% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.2 2.3

Population Comparison: South plainfield vs Corwith

  • In South plainfield, the population is higher at 24,228, compared to 265 in Corwith.
  • The median age in Corwith is higher at 48.9 years, compared to 41.8 years in South plainfield.
  • South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417 compared to $48,125 in Corwith.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South plainfield at 50.0% compared to 37.0% in Corwith.
  • South plainfield has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Corwith.
  • The unemployment rate in South plainfield is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.3% in Corwith.

Demographics

Demographics South plainfield vs Corwith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South plainfield Corwith
Black 12 Data is updating
White 46 94
Asian 17 Data is updating
Hispanic 18 1
Two or More Races 7 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South plainfield vs Corwith

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South plainfield at 12% compared to 0% in Corwith.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Corwith at 94% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in South plainfield at 17% compared to 0% in Corwith.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South plainfield at 18% compared to 1% in Corwith.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South plainfield at 7% compared to 5% in Corwith.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South plainfield and Corwith at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South plainfield Corwith
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 10.1%
Depression 19.0% 18.7%
Smoking 12.0% 18.8%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 22.1%
Obesity 29.0% 36.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South plainfield vs Corwith

  • In Corwith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South plainfield at 19.0% compared to 18.7% in Corwith.
  • Corwith has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 12.0% in South plainfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Corwith at 22.1% compared to 15.2% in South plainfield.
  • Corwith has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 29.0% in South plainfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Corwith at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South plainfield Corwith
No Schooling 1.4% (328) 2.6% (7)
High School Diploma 16.6% (4,012) 26.8% (71)
Less than High School 9.0% (2,175) 22.3% (59)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.5% (7,629) 7.9% (21)

Education Levels Comparison: South plainfield vs Corwith

  • In Corwith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.4% in South plainfield.
  • In Corwith, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.8% compared to 16.6% in South plainfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corwith at 22.3%, compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 7.9% in Corwith.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.