Demographics details for South plainfield, NJ vs Antlers, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South plainfield, NJ vs Antlers, OK.

Data South plainfield Antlers
Population 24,228 2,198
Median Age 41.8 years 36.7 years
Median Income $123,417 $27,798
Married Families 50.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 6% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.5

Population Comparison: South plainfield vs Antlers

  • In South plainfield, the population is higher at 24,228, compared to 2,198 in Antlers.
  • Residents in South plainfield have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 36.7 years in Antlers.
  • South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417 compared to $27,798 in Antlers.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South plainfield at 50.0% compared to 37.0% in Antlers.
  • The poverty level is higher in Antlers at 18%, compared to 6% in South plainfield.
  • Antlers has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in South plainfield.

Demographics

Demographics South plainfield vs Antlers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South plainfield Antlers
Black 12 3
White 46 63
Asian 17 1
Hispanic 18 5
Two or More Races 7 15
American Indian Data is updating 13

Demographics Comparison: South plainfield vs Antlers

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South plainfield at 12% compared to 3% in Antlers.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Antlers at 63% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in South plainfield at 17% compared to 1% in Antlers.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South plainfield at 18% compared to 5% in Antlers.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Antlers at 15%, compared to 7% in South plainfield.
  • In Antlers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in South plainfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South plainfield Antlers
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 15.6%
Depression 19.0% 28.5%
Smoking 12.0% 26.4%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 14.1%
Obesity 29.0% 40.5%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 36.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South plainfield vs Antlers

  • In Antlers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Antlers at 28.5% versus 19.0% in South plainfield.
  • Antlers has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 12.0% in South plainfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South plainfield at 15.2% compared to 14.1% in Antlers.
  • Antlers has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 29.0% in South plainfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Antlers at 36.0% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South plainfield Antlers
No Schooling 1.4% (328) 1.0% (23)
High School Diploma 16.6% (4,012) 23.4% (515)
Less than High School 9.0% (2,175) 26.2% (575)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.5% (7,629) 10.7% (236)

Education Levels Comparison: South plainfield vs Antlers

  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Antlers.
  • In Antlers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.4% compared to 16.6% in South plainfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Antlers at 26.2%, compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 10.7% in Antlers.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.