Demographics details for South pasadena, CA vs West jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South pasadena, CA vs West jordan, UT.

Data South pasadena West jordan
Population 25,850 116,664
Median Age 40.6 years 32.6 years
Median Income $127,882 $99,002
Married Families 45.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 8% 7%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 3.5

Population Comparison: South pasadena vs West jordan

  • The population in West jordan is higher at 116,664, compared to 25,850 in South pasadena.
  • Residents in South pasadena have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 32.6 years in West jordan.
  • South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882 compared to $99,002 in West jordan.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South pasadena at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in West jordan.
  • South pasadena has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in West jordan.
  • The unemployment rate in South pasadena is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in West jordan.

Demographics

Demographics South pasadena vs West jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South pasadena West jordan
Black 4 1
White 31 62
Asian 34 3
Hispanic 19 23
Two or More Races 12 10
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: South pasadena vs West jordan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South pasadena at 4% compared to 1% in West jordan.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in West jordan at 62% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
  • The Asian population is larger in South pasadena at 34% compared to 3% in West jordan.
  • West jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 19% in South pasadena.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South pasadena at 12% compared to 10% in West jordan.
  • In West jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in South pasadena.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South pasadena West jordan
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 18.2%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 10.7%
Depression 13.8% 27.0%
Smoking 6.3% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 15.9%
Obesity 20.9% 31.1%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South pasadena vs West jordan

  • In West jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in West jordan at 27.0% versus 13.8% in South pasadena.
  • West jordan has a higher smoking rate at 9.2% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in West jordan at 15.9% compared to 15.3% in South pasadena.
  • West jordan has higher obesity rates at 31.1% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both South pasadena and West jordan at 7.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South pasadena West jordan
No Schooling 0.7% (177) 0.8% (961)
High School Diploma 4.3% (1,111) 14.5% (16,942)
Less than High School 3.0% (766) 9.5% (11,126)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 53.2% (13,751) 17.0% (19,799)

Education Levels Comparison: South pasadena vs West jordan

  • In West jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in South pasadena.
  • In West jordan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in West jordan at 9.5%, compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 17.0% in West jordan.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.