Demographics details for South pasadena, CA vs Philadelphia, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South pasadena, CA vs Philadelphia, PA.

Data South pasadena Philadelphia
Population 25,850 1,567,258
Median Age 40.6 years 34.8 years
Median Income $127,882 $57,537
Married Families 45.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 8% 25%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.7

Population Comparison: South pasadena vs Philadelphia

  • The population in Philadelphia is higher at 1,567,258, compared to 25,850 in South pasadena.
  • Residents in South pasadena have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 34.8 years in Philadelphia.
  • South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882 compared to $57,537 in Philadelphia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South pasadena at 45.0% compared to 26.0% in Philadelphia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Philadelphia at 25%, compared to 8% in South pasadena.
  • The unemployment rate in South pasadena is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.7% in Philadelphia.

Demographics

Demographics South pasadena vs Philadelphia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South pasadena Philadelphia
Black 4 41
White 31 29
Asian 34 8
Hispanic 19 16
Two or More Races 12 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South pasadena vs Philadelphia

  • In Philadelphia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 4% in South pasadena.
  • South pasadena has a higher percentage of White residents at 31% compared to 29% in Philadelphia.
  • The Asian population is larger in South pasadena at 34% compared to 8% in Philadelphia.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South pasadena at 19% compared to 16% in Philadelphia.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South pasadena at 12% compared to 6% in Philadelphia.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South pasadena and Philadelphia at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South pasadena Philadelphia
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 12.8%
Depression 13.8% 21.0%
Smoking 6.3% 18.9%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 16.9%
Obesity 20.9% 31.3%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South pasadena vs Philadelphia

  • In Philadelphia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Philadelphia at 21.0% versus 13.8% in South pasadena.
  • Philadelphia has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Philadelphia at 16.9% compared to 15.3% in South pasadena.
  • Philadelphia has higher obesity rates at 31.3% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Philadelphia at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in South pasadena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South pasadena Philadelphia
No Schooling 0.7% (177) 1.5% (23,668)
High School Diploma 4.3% (1,111) 18.3% (287,402)
Less than High School 3.0% (766) 13.3% (207,719)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 53.2% (13,751) 23.4% (366,310)

Education Levels Comparison: South pasadena vs Philadelphia

  • In Philadelphia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in South pasadena.
  • In Philadelphia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Philadelphia at 13.3%, compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 23.4% in Philadelphia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.