Demographics details for South pasadena, CA vs Harker heights, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South pasadena, CA vs Harker heights, TX.

Data South pasadena Harker heights
Population 25,850 34,102
Median Age 40.6 years 34.5 years
Median Income $127,882 $72,258
Married Families 45.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 8% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 5.0

Population Comparison: South pasadena vs Harker heights

  • The population in Harker heights is higher at 34,102, compared to 25,850 in South pasadena.
  • Residents in South pasadena have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
  • South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882 compared to $72,258 in Harker heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South pasadena at 45.0% compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Harker heights at 9%, compared to 8% in South pasadena.
  • The unemployment rate in South pasadena is higher at 5.1%, compared to 5.0% in Harker heights.

Demographics

Demographics South pasadena vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South pasadena Harker heights
Black 4 28
White 31 36
Asian 34 3
Hispanic 19 21
Two or More Races 12 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: South pasadena vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 4% in South pasadena.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Harker heights at 36% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
  • The Asian population is larger in South pasadena at 34% compared to 3% in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 19% in South pasadena.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South pasadena at 12% compared to 11% in Harker heights.
  • In Harker heights, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in South pasadena.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South pasadena Harker heights
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 10.8%
Depression 13.8% 22.5%
Smoking 6.3% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 17.1%
Obesity 20.9% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South pasadena vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Harker heights at 22.5% versus 13.8% in South pasadena.
  • Harker heights has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Harker heights at 17.1% compared to 15.3% in South pasadena.
  • Harker heights has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harker heights at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in South pasadena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South pasadena Harker heights
No Schooling 0.7% (177) 1.3% (448)
High School Diploma 4.3% (1,111) 11.6% (3,958)
Less than High School 3.0% (766) 10.3% (3,509)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 53.2% (13,751) 18.8% (6,403)

Education Levels Comparison: South pasadena vs Harker heights

  • In Harker heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in South pasadena.
  • In Harker heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.6% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harker heights at 10.3%, compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 18.8% in Harker heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.