Demographics details for South pasadena, CA vs Hankinson, ND

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South pasadena, CA vs Hankinson, ND.

Data South pasadena Hankinson
Population 25,850 919
Median Age 40.6 years 39.7 years
Median Income $127,882 $57,031
Married Families 45.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 2.5

Population Comparison: South pasadena vs Hankinson

  • In South pasadena, the population is higher at 25,850, compared to 919 in Hankinson.
  • Residents in South pasadena have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 39.7 years in Hankinson.
  • South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882 compared to $57,031 in Hankinson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South pasadena at 45.0% compared to 33.0% in Hankinson.
  • South pasadena has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Hankinson.
  • The unemployment rate in South pasadena is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.5% in Hankinson.

Demographics

Demographics South pasadena vs Hankinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South pasadena Hankinson
Black 4 1
White 31 96
Asian 34 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 Data is updating
Two or More Races 12 1
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: South pasadena vs Hankinson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South pasadena at 4% compared to 1% in Hankinson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Hankinson at 96% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
  • The Asian population is larger in South pasadena at 34% compared to 0% in Hankinson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South pasadena at 19% compared to 0% in Hankinson.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South pasadena at 12% compared to 1% in Hankinson.
  • In Hankinson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in South pasadena.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South pasadena Hankinson
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 9.9%
Depression 13.8% 19.9%
Smoking 6.3% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 23.6%
Obesity 20.9% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South pasadena vs Hankinson

  • In Hankinson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Hankinson at 19.9% versus 13.8% in South pasadena.
  • Hankinson has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hankinson at 23.6% compared to 15.3% in South pasadena.
  • Hankinson has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hankinson at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in South pasadena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South pasadena Hankinson
No Schooling 0.7% (177) 0.2% (2)
High School Diploma 4.3% (1,111) 16.6% (153)
Less than High School 3.0% (766) 11.1% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 53.2% (13,751) 14.0% (129)

Education Levels Comparison: South pasadena vs Hankinson

  • A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Hankinson.
  • In Hankinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hankinson at 11.1%, compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 14.0% in Hankinson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.