Demographics details for South pasadena, CA vs Danville, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South pasadena, CA vs Danville, IL.

Data South pasadena Danville
Population 25,850 28,472
Median Age 40.6 years 38.6 years
Median Income $127,882 $42,424
Married Families 45.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 8% 20%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 8.6

Population Comparison: South pasadena vs Danville

  • The population in Danville is higher at 28,472, compared to 25,850 in South pasadena.
  • Residents in South pasadena have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 38.6 years in Danville.
  • South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882 compared to $42,424 in Danville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South pasadena at 45.0% compared to 25.0% in Danville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Danville at 20%, compared to 8% in South pasadena.
  • Danville has a higher unemployment rate at 8.6% compared to 5.1% in South pasadena.

Demographics

Demographics South pasadena vs Danville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South pasadena Danville
Black 4 34
White 31 52
Asian 34 1
Hispanic 19 8
Two or More Races 12 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South pasadena vs Danville

  • In Danville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 34% compared to 4% in South pasadena.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Danville at 52% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
  • The Asian population is larger in South pasadena at 34% compared to 1% in Danville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South pasadena at 19% compared to 8% in Danville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South pasadena at 12% compared to 5% in Danville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South pasadena and Danville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South pasadena Danville
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 14.5%
Depression 13.8% 21.2%
Smoking 6.3% 23.9%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 14.9%
Obesity 20.9% 41.4%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South pasadena vs Danville

  • In Danville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Danville at 21.2% versus 13.8% in South pasadena.
  • Danville has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South pasadena at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Danville.
  • Danville has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Danville at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in South pasadena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South pasadena Danville
No Schooling 0.7% (177) 0.9% (270)
High School Diploma 4.3% (1,111) 20.6% (5,853)
Less than High School 3.0% (766) 13.1% (3,727)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 53.2% (13,751) 11.7% (3,344)

Education Levels Comparison: South pasadena vs Danville

  • In Danville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in South pasadena.
  • In Danville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.6% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Danville at 13.1%, compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 11.7% in Danville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.