Demographics details for South pasadena, CA vs Concordia, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South pasadena, CA vs Concordia, KS.

Data South pasadena Concordia
Population 25,850 5,054
Median Age 40.6 years 36.3 years
Median Income $127,882 $45,000
Married Families 45.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 8% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.0

Population Comparison: South pasadena vs Concordia

  • In South pasadena, the population is higher at 25,850, compared to 5,054 in Concordia.
  • Residents in South pasadena have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 36.3 years in Concordia.
  • South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882 compared to $45,000 in Concordia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South pasadena at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Concordia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Concordia at 13%, compared to 8% in South pasadena.
  • The unemployment rate in South pasadena is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.0% in Concordia.

Demographics

Demographics South pasadena vs Concordia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South pasadena Concordia
Black 4 2
White 31 87
Asian 34 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 7
Two or More Races 12 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South pasadena vs Concordia

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South pasadena at 4% compared to 2% in Concordia.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Concordia at 87% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
  • The Asian population is larger in South pasadena at 34% compared to 0% in Concordia.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South pasadena at 19% compared to 7% in Concordia.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South pasadena at 12% compared to 4% in Concordia.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South pasadena and Concordia at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South pasadena Concordia
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 17.2%
Physical Health Not Good 7.1% 11.1%
Depression 13.8% 21.9%
Smoking 6.3% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 15.3% 19.3%
Obesity 20.9% 37.9%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South pasadena vs Concordia

  • In Concordia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Concordia at 21.9% versus 13.8% in South pasadena.
  • Concordia has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Concordia at 19.3% compared to 15.3% in South pasadena.
  • Concordia has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Concordia at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in South pasadena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South pasadena Concordia
No Schooling 0.7% (177) 0.5% (26)
High School Diploma 4.3% (1,111) 19.4% (983)
Less than High School 3.0% (766) 6.4% (324)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 53.2% (13,751) 13.6% (688)

Education Levels Comparison: South pasadena vs Concordia

  • A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Concordia.
  • In Concordia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Concordia at 6.4%, compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 13.6% in Concordia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.