Demographics details for South pasadena, CA vs Carthage, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South pasadena, CA vs Carthage, MO.
Data | South pasadena | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,850 | 15,491 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 31.6 years |
Median Income | $127,882 | $43,526 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: South pasadena vs Carthage
- In South pasadena, the population is higher at 25,850, compared to 15,491 in Carthage.
- Residents in South pasadena have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 31.6 years in Carthage.
- South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882 compared to $43,526 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South pasadena at 45.0% compared to 29.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 14%, compared to 8% in South pasadena.
- The unemployment rate in South pasadena is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Carthage.
Demographics
Demographics South pasadena vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South pasadena | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 2 |
White | 31 | 52 |
Asian | 34 | 1 |
Hispanic | 19 | 33 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: South pasadena vs Carthage
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South pasadena at 4% compared to 2% in Carthage.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carthage at 52% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
- The Asian population is larger in South pasadena at 34% compared to 1% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 19% in South pasadena.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South pasadena at 12% compared to 10% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in South pasadena.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South pasadena | Carthage |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.9% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 16.0% |
Depression | 13.8% | 26.7% |
Smoking | 6.3% | 24.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 20.9% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South pasadena vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 26.7% versus 13.8% in South pasadena.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
- Binge drinking is more common in South pasadena at 15.3% compared to 15.0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in South pasadena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South pasadena | Carthage |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (177) | 3.7% (576) |
High School Diploma | 4.3% (1,111) | 13.1% (2,032) |
Less than High School | 3.0% (766) | 30.4% (4,717) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 53.2% (13,751) | 12.9% (2,006) |
Education Levels Comparison: South pasadena vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.7% in South pasadena.
- In Carthage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 30.4%, compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
- A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 12.9% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.